<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web based Chinese input</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.haidongji.com/2006/06/29/web-based-chinese-input/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.haidongji.com/2006/06/29/web-based-chinese-input/</link>
	<description>季庄新闻--Haidong Ji's Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Haidong Ji</title>
		<link>http://www.haidongji.com/2006/06/29/web-based-chinese-input/#comment-2146</link>
		<dc:creator>Haidong Ji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.haidongji.com/2006/06/29/web-based-chinese-input/#comment-2146</guid>
		<description>我不会智能拼音。看来得抽空学习一下。。。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>我不会智能拼音。看来得抽空学习一下。。。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xilian liu</title>
		<link>http://www.haidongji.com/2006/06/29/web-based-chinese-input/#comment-2144</link>
		<dc:creator>xilian liu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 07:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.haidongji.com/2006/06/29/web-based-chinese-input/#comment-2144</guid>
		<description>我个人非常喜欢智能拼音，速度基本在120个/分（汉字），尽管我不是专业的打字员。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>我个人非常喜欢智能拼音，速度基本在120个/分（汉字），尽管我不是专业的打字员。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haidong Ji</title>
		<link>http://www.haidongji.com/2006/06/29/web-based-chinese-input/#comment-1488</link>
		<dc:creator>Haidong Ji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.haidongji.com/2006/06/29/web-based-chinese-input/#comment-1488</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing Brendan.

I guess I will stick with Ziguang. I just don't want to miss out something really easy and efficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing Brendan.</p>
<p>I guess I will stick with Ziguang. I just don&#8217;t want to miss out something really easy and efficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.haidongji.com/2006/06/29/web-based-chinese-input/#comment-1487</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 05:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.haidongji.com/2006/06/29/web-based-chinese-input/#comment-1487</guid>
		<description>I switch between Ziguang Pinyin and Microsoft Pinyin at work. No particular reason - both are good, though I find that MS Pinyin tends to be a little better at word segmentation for common words, whereas Ziguang is a bit better for stuff that I've already taught it.
At home, I use Mac OS X, which has a much sparser choice; there's the built-in Pinyin input, which sucks, and a third-party input, QiM, which also sucks, but sucks slightly less. I've actually thought about learning Wubi/Cangjie/something else, just to get rid of the disappointing Mac input solutions, but I type quickly enough in Pinyin that the alleged speed benefits of Wubi aren't all that compelling to me, and it seems like it'd be a real pain to learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I switch between Ziguang Pinyin and Microsoft Pinyin at work. No particular reason - both are good, though I find that MS Pinyin tends to be a little better at word segmentation for common words, whereas Ziguang is a bit better for stuff that I&#8217;ve already taught it.<br />
At home, I use Mac OS X, which has a much sparser choice; there&#8217;s the built-in Pinyin input, which sucks, and a third-party input, QiM, which also sucks, but sucks slightly less. I&#8217;ve actually thought about learning Wubi/Cangjie/something else, just to get rid of the disappointing Mac input solutions, but I type quickly enough in Pinyin that the alleged speed benefits of Wubi aren&#8217;t all that compelling to me, and it seems like it&#8217;d be a real pain to learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
